Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 03:01

Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Giant cable and satellite company closer to Chapter 11 bankruptcy - TheStreet
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Presidential Message on National Men’s Health Week, 2025 - The White House (.gov)
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
George E. Smith, Nobel laureate who envisioned digital imagery, dies at 95 - The Washington Post
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
What is your daily motivation and does it work?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
At least 45 Palestinians killed while waiting for aid trucks in Gaza, health officials say - AP News
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Thank you.
Is it possible for the U.S. government to get rid of the constitution for national safety?